Blog
Blog




Blog




Blog
Blog
Blog
Blog
Blog
Blog
Blog
Blog
Blog
Blog
Blog
Blog
Blog
Blog
Blog





Blog
Blog
Blog


Blog
Blog
Blog
Blog
Blog
Blog
Blog
Blog
Blog





Blog
Blog








Blog


Blog





Blog
Blog
Blog
Blog
Blog
Blog
Blog
Blog
Blog
Blog
Blog
Blog
Blog
Blog




Blog
Blog




Blog




Blog
Blog
Blog
Blog
Blog
Blog










Blog
Blog
Blog
Blog
Blog
Blog
Blog
Blog




Blog




Blog
Blog
Blog












Blog
Blog
Blog
Blog
Blog










Blog




Blog






Blog
Blog








Blog
Blog
Blog
Blog
Blog






Blog






Blog
Blog
Blog

The Death of the Artist—and the Birth of the Creative Entrepreneur

Pronounce the word artist, to conjure up the image of a solitary genius. A sacred aura still attaches to the word, a sense of one in contact with the numinous. “He’s an artist,” we’ll say in tones of reverence about an actor or musician or director. “A true artist,” we’ll solemnly proclaim our favorite singer or photographer, meaning someone who appears to dwell upon a higher plane. Vision, inspiration, mysterious gifts as from above: such are some of the associations that continue to adorn the word.

Yet the notion of the artist as a solitary genius—so potent a cultural force, so determinative, still, of the way we think of creativity in general—is decades out of date. So out of date, in fact, that the model that replaced it is itself already out of date. A new paradigm is emerging, and has been since about the turn of the millennium, one that’s in the process of reshaping what artists are: how they work, train, trade, collaborate, think of themselves and are thought of—even what art is—just as the solitary-genius model did two centuries ago. The new paradigm may finally destroy the very notion of “art” as such—that sacred spiritual substance—which the older one created.

By: William Deresiewicz - Exercept from, "The Atlantic"